Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon Pro 5500M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 244 days older than Radeon Pro 5500M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 85 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Radeon Pro 5500M - 231 vs 222 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Radeon Pro 5500M
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro 5500M
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
46.4 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
88%
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
| 1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
| 1450 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |
